当番薯国法律成为法克的时候

一个国家的法官可以不要脸到这个地步。　家有幼女的人，如果你让这种番薯政府运作下去，有一天你的女儿孙女被看上的时候，　那就真的是最好的报应。



 Safer to rape lil' girls than to steal beer 作者把事情说得非常清楚，所以我就不重复了，就用谷歌翻译吧。

Hellooooooooo, yang arif, both victims were sub-16. What kind of judgement have been these, where you two don't understand what is 'statutory rape' .

The law states clearly that a person below the age of 16 is deemed unable to make an informed decision and/or appreciate the possible consequences of the decision.

Thus, consensual sex is totally irrelevant in statutory rape!

Thus, non-coercion is totally irrelevant in statutory rape!

Thus, any adult who had sex with a girl below the age of 16 has committed statutory rape, regardless of consent by the victim or that there was no force or coercion!

The Malaysian Insider (TMI) reported in its news article Rapists freed by courts match medical definition of paedophiles that the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD) categorizes paedophilia as ‘a sexual preference for children boys or girls or both usually of pre-pubertal or early pubertal age’, ... ... while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) used by mental health professionals globally states 'paedophilia is the sexual attraction to pubescent or pre-pubescents aged 13 or younger and the subject must be 16 or older with the child at least five years younger'.

TMI states the two slimy maggots fit the medical profiles of paedophiles and that international research of paedophilia as a sexual disorder suggests that paedophiles start offending at a young age.

I was totally gob-smacked by the judge's explanation in the earlier case, where he had dared, in a case of statutory rape, to use the excuse that Nor Afizal did not use force and it was consensual sex.

哈囖，公正的法官， 两位受害人都是16岁以下。 这算是什么判决，你们两个所谓的法官难道不明白什么叫“法定強姦罪"吗？

該法明確指出，16歲以下的人被認為是無法作出明智的決定和/或享受/感激所產生的後果。

因此，雙方同意的性行為不能用来否定法定的強姦罪!

所以，非強迫性行为,也不能用来否定法定強姦罪！

因此，任何成年人，16歲以下的女孩發生了性關係，　就是法定的強姦罪，無論受害人同意/或加害人没有使用暴力或脅迫手段！

“馬來西亞內幕（TMI）在其新聞文章報導，　被法院釋放的強姦犯,都符合醫學定義的戀童癖者，在世界健康組織的國際分類疾病（ICD）分類戀童癖作為　：“　一個性偏好為兒童男孩或女孩，或兩者通常的預青春期或青春早期時代“，......而精神疾病診斷與統計手冊（DSM）全球精神衛生專業人員对于戀童癖的阐释 ：　戀童癖者，癖好短柔毛或13歲或更年輕的孩子，　　戀童癖者是16歲以上，　而目标是至少５岁以上的未发育儿童”。 TMI的说明的性功能障礙的醫療模式的戀童癖适用在这两个人蛆上面　　而且國際化的研究表明，戀童癖者開始在年輕的時候犯罪。

我对于两个法官的解釋不能不吃惊，在既定的法定強姦罪下，还可以挣眼说瞎话来为加害者辩护，说加害者Afizal没使用武力，加害人和受害者性行為是兩廂情願的。